Skip to main content
StackraStackra
All benchmarks
CMS

Ghost Benchmarks

Ghost is an open-source publishing platform focused on blogs, newsletters, and memberships. This page shows how Ghost sites perform and what they run, from a sample of 374 US websites.

About Ghost

Built for

Publishers, creators, and media teams focused on content and subscriptions.

Most common use

A blog or online publication.

Strengths
  • Clean writing and editing experience
  • Built-in memberships and newsletters
  • Good performance and modern stack
Watch-outs
  • Less general-purpose than WordPress
  • Theme ecosystem is smaller
  • Custom features may need development

What we see on Ghost sites

What Ghost does well
  • Ghost sites show the highest content-to-code ratio of any CMS in our corpus. Publishing frequency is high, categorization is consistent, and content is well-tagged. These sites know what they're about.
  • Newsletter integration creates unique engagement architecture -- Ghost sites are often distribution-first, with the website as the archive of record rather than the acquisition channel.
  • Ghost has the best INP scores of any CMS platform we benchmark. Minimal JavaScript footprint means fast interaction response time.
Common issues
  • Missing LocalBusiness or Organization schema. Ghost is content-first; it doesn't prompt for business identity information.
  • Limited CTA and conversion elements relative to the audience size these content-rich sites attract. Strong organic traffic, weak revenue architecture.
  • Membership gating that creates indexability challenges when overdone. Gated content can't be indexed.
Things we've noticed
  • Ghost sites show the highest word count per page of any CMS in our corpus. The content-first architecture produces actual content density -- not keyword stuffing, but real editorial depth.
  • Ghost has the best INP scores of any CMS platform we benchmark. Minimal JavaScript footprint means fast interaction response -- this is one of the clearest platform-architecture-to-performance relationships in our data.

Businesses that use Ghost

The industries most commonly running Ghost sites.

#1Content and media#2Nonprofits#3Portfolios#4Entertainment#5Professional services

Ghost performance overview

81%
CWV pass rate
100 field-data sites
1.2s
Median LCP
50ms
Median INP
0.00
Median CLS

Ghost tool adoption

CDN98%
Analytics95%
Payments50%
Email capture49%
Tag manager24%
Marketing automation11%
Cookie compliance8%
Live chat5%
CRM4%
Reviews3%
SEO plugins2%
Maps2%
A/B testing1%
Booking1%
Reservations0%

Ghost structured data and SEO markup

Canonical tag100%
Open Graph100%
Twitter Card100%
JSON-LD100%
Organization schema100%
WebSite schema94%
Article schema9%
Product schema3%
Microdata2%
Breadcrumb schema2%
LocalBusiness schema1%
FAQPage schema1%

Most-used tools on Ghost sites

Analytics
  • 1Tinybird
  • 2Google Analytics
  • 3Cloudflare Browser Insights
SEO
  • 1Yoast SEO
  • 2Ahrefs
  • 3RankMath SEO
Live chat
  • 1HubSpot Chat
  • 2Intercom
  • 3WhatsApp Business Chat
Reviews
  • 1Trustpilot
  • 2Trustindex
  • 3Rich Plugins Reviews
Booking
  • 1Calendly
  • 2FareHarbor
CDN
  • 1jsDelivr
  • 2Cloudflare
  • 3Bunny
Marketing automation
  • 1HubSpot
  • 2ActiveCampaign
  • 3MailChimp
Cookie compliance
  • 1Funding Choices
  • 2iubenda
  • 3CookieYes

Top countries for Ghost sites

usukcaio

See how your site compares

Run a free scan and see how your site stacks up against these benchmarks.

Percentages show the share of Ghost sites where each signal was detected. Data covers US websites only. Benchmarks derived from public web-performance datasets (HTTP Archive and the Chrome UX Report); cleaning, business-type classification, and analysis are Stackra's own.